Analytic philosophy started as a reaction to Kant’s epistemology in the Vienna Circle, picked up its linguistic impetus through Wittgenstein, became strictly formulated by Logical Positivists and others, and continues today strongly in philosophy of mind, among other disciplines. The definition (preceding the examples) is methodological, rather than historical, and identifies three characteristic features: 1. A number of continental approaches claim to access a privileged domain of experience that penetrates beneath the veneer of common sense and science experience. What are we to do with analytic and continental philosophy, then? Analytical philosophy, also known as conceptual analysis, begins to take shape when the nineteenth century is about to end. Analytic philosophy draws on the tools of logic. 2. Analytic philosophy identifies with the sciences and mathematics. 3. analytic philosophy called the philosophy of ideal language. This is a broad survey of the chronology of the rift between continental and analytic philosophy, starting in 1899. This is because the natural sciences (biology, physics, chemistry) had advanced in such a concrete and safe way that many of the contemporary philosophers felt some displacement before which they wanted to respond shrewdly. I argue that analytic philosophy is usefully seen as philosophy conducted within a paradigm, in Kuhn's sense of the word, whereas Continental philosophy assumes much less in the way of shared presuppositions, problems, methods and approaches. … Typically, analytic philosophy appeals to experience understood as common-sense intuitions (as well as their developments and transformations by science) and to reason understood as the standard rules of logical inference. This is not the case. Analytic philosophy aims for argumentative clarity and precision. They are always seeking knowledge . There are drawbacks associated with being an analytical thinker, and here are some of the most major ones: 1. You might think that being an analytical thinker is a gift, and those who possess it always have long careers of their own choosing and can form relationships easily. Cudd notes that there is at best a family resemblance among analytic feminists. This important opposition accounts for all those features that have rightly been held to constitute the difference between the two traditions. Among the characteristics she cites are the following: ... She writes that contemporary analytic philosophy, “by remaining within the Empiricist tradition, inherits not only the problems of that tradition, but also a self-definition that identifies it as necessarily men's philosophy…. It included the logical atomism of B. Russell and L. Wittgenstein, and neopositivism which was started by the Vienna Circle (M. Schlick, R. Carnap, O. Neurath).