Theorem 1 (Distributive Law 1): If, and are sets then. For any two two sets, the following statements are true. Distributive Law. Distributive law – A ∩ (B∩ C) = (A ∩ B) U(A ∩ C) Difference of Sets The difference of set A and B is represented as: A – B = {x: x ϵ A and x ϵ B} {converse holds true for B – A}. Distributive law of set is A ∩ (B ∪ C) = (A ∩ B) ∪ (A ∩ C) Let us prove it by Venn diagram Let’s take 3 sets – A, B, C However, trying a few examples has considerable merit insofar as it makes us more comfortable with the statement in question. A = {x : - 3 â‰¤ x < 4, x âˆŠ R} that is, A consists of all real numbers from – 3 upto 4 but 4 is not included. (ii)  Intersection distributes over union. We pursue distributive laws between monads, particularly in the context of KZ-doctrines, and show that a very basic distributive law has (constructively) completely distributive lattices for its algebras. Append content without editing the whole page source. (B U C)  =  {1, 2, 3, 4} U {- 5, - 3, - 1, 0, 1, 3}, An(B U C) = {-3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3} n {-5, -3, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4}, (A n B)  =   {-3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3} n {1, 2, 3, 4}, (A n C)  =   {-3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3} n {- 5, - 3, - 1, 0, 1, 3}, (A n B) U (A n C)  =  {1, 2, 3} U {-3, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3}. See pages that link to and include this page. Notify administrators if there is objectionable content in this page. numbers from – 3 upto 4 but 4 is not included. Wikidot.com Terms of Service - what you can, what you should not etc. Distributive property of set : Here we are going to see the distributive property used in sets. Something does not work as expected? Change the name (also URL address, possibly the category) of the page. It also provides systematic procedures for evaluating expressions, and performing calculations, involving these operations and relations. We will now look at the distributive laws for three sets. If it holds only for finitely many sets how do I prove that finite intersections of $\sigma$-sets is a $\sigma$-set? View and manage file attachments for this page. Distributive laws also establish the rules of taking unions and intersections of sets. Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under. Apart from the stuff given above, if you want to know more about "Distributive property of set", please click here. Indeed, if the statement is not true for the example, we have disproved the statement. A n (B u C) = (A n B) U (A n C) If you have any feedback about our math content, please mail us : You can also visit the following web pages on different stuff in math. A U (B n C) = (A U B) n (A U C) (ii) Intersection distributes over union. After having gone through the stuff given above, we hope that the students would have understood "Distributive property of set". Distributive Laws of Sets Distributive Laws of Sets We will now look at the distributive laws for three sets. (A U B)  =  {0, 1, 2, 3, 4} U {1, - 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, (A U C)  =   {0, 1, 2, 3, 4} U {2, 4, 6, 7}, (AUB) n (AUC) = {-2, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} n {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7}, For A = {x : - 3 â‰¤ x < 4, x âˆŠ R}, B = {x ; x < 5, x âˆŠ N} and C = {- 5, - 3, - 1,0,1,3}, Show that A n (B U C) = (A n B) U (A n C). Click here to toggle editing of individual sections of the page (if possible). It does not prove the distributive law for all possible sets A, A, B, B, and C C and hence is an invalid method of proof. So, the 3× can be "distributed" across the 2+4, into 3×2 and 3×4. So, yes, the distributive law works for infinite, even uncountable families of sets. View/set parent page (used for creating breadcrumbs and structured layout). Distributive Laws of Sets. real-analysis elementary-set-theory. (A ∩ B) ∩ C = A ∩ (B ∩ C) (Associative law).∅ ∩ A = A ∪ (B ∩ C) = (A ∪ B) ∩ (A ∪ C) First law states that taking the union of a set to the intersection of two other sets is the same as taking the union of the original set and both the other two sets separately, and then taking the intersection of the results. Intersection of sets A & B has all the elements which are common to set A and set BIt is represented by symbol ∩Let A = {1, 2,3, 4} , B = {3, 4, 5, 6}A ∩ B = {3, 4}The blue region is A ∩ BProperties of IntersectionA ∩ B = B ∩ A (Commutative law). If you want to discuss contents of this page - this is the easiest way to do it. In this step I don't know am I allowed to use distributive law for infinitely many sets? And we write it like this: (i) Union distributes over intersection. Find out what you can do. Apart from the stuff, if you need any other stuff in math, please use our google custom search here. Or the law holds only for finitely many sets? This is what it lets us do: 3 lots of (2+4) is the same as 3 lots of 2 plus 3 lots of 4. Therefore, this set of values serves as a counterexample to a distributive law of addition over multiplication. (B n C) = {1, - 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} n {2, 4, 6, 7}. Solving linear equations using elimination method, Solving linear equations using substitution method, Solving linear equations using cross multiplication method, Solving quadratic equations by quadratic formula, Solving quadratic equations by completing square, Nature of the roots of a quadratic equations, Sum and product of the roots of a quadratic equations, Complementary and supplementary worksheet, Complementary and supplementary word problems worksheet, Sum of the angles in a triangle is 180 degree worksheet, Special line segments in triangles worksheet, Proving trigonometric identities worksheet, Quadratic equations word problems worksheet, Distributive property of multiplication worksheet - I, Distributive property of multiplication worksheet - II, Writing and evaluating expressions worksheet, Nature of the roots of a quadratic equation worksheets, Determine if the relationship is proportional worksheet, Trigonometric ratios of some specific angles, Trigonometric ratios of some negative angles, Trigonometric ratios of 90 degree minus theta, Trigonometric ratios of 90 degree plus theta, Trigonometric ratios of 180 degree plus theta, Trigonometric ratios of 180 degree minus theta, Trigonometric ratios of 270 degree minus theta, Trigonometric ratios of 270 degree plus theta, Trigonometric ratios of angles greater than or equal to 360 degree, Trigonometric ratios of complementary angles, Trigonometric ratios of supplementary angles, Domain and range of trigonometric functions, Domain and range of inverse  trigonometric functions, Sum of the angle in a triangle is 180 degree, Different forms equations of straight lines, Word problems on direct variation and inverse variation, Complementary and supplementary angles word problems, Word problems on sum of the angles of a triangle is 180 degree, Domain and range of rational functions with holes, Converting repeating decimals in to fractions, Decimal representation of rational numbers, L.C.M method to solve time and work problems, Translating the word problems in to algebraic expressions, Remainder when 2 power 256 is divided by 17, Remainder when 17 power 23 is divided by 16, Sum of all three digit numbers divisible by 6, Sum of all three digit numbers divisible by 7, Sum of all three digit numbers divisible by 8, Sum of all three digit numbers formed using 1, 3, 4, Sum of all three four digit numbers formed with non zero digits, Sum of all three four digit numbers formed using 0, 1, 2, 3, Sum of all three four digit numbers formed using 1, 2, 5, 6, How to Prove the Given Vertices form a Rhombus, Verify the Given Points are Vertices of Parallelogram Worksheet, C = {- 5, - 3, - 1,0,1,3}, Show that A n (B U C) = (A n B) U (A n C). The "Distributive Law" is the BEST one of all, but needs careful attention. Here we are going to see the distributive property used in sets. They are applicable to all sets including the set of real numbers. We will now look at the distributive laws for three sets. (i) Union distributes over intersection A U (B n C) = (A U B) n (A U C) Topics business mathematics associative and distributive laws of set operations Associative laws establish the rules of taking unions and intersections of sets.