The SM57, is heralded as an amazing snare mic. The e609 delivers on all fronts, able to withstand high SPL's, and still … There’s a mid-range boost on the SM57 that is lacking in the e609. endstream endobj 109 0 obj <>stream endstream endobj 105 0 obj <>>> endobj 106 0 obj >/PageWidthList<0 595.276>>>>>>/Resources<>/XObject<>>>/Rotate 0/TrimBox[0.0 0.0 595.276 841.89]/Type/Page>> endobj 107 0 obj <> endobj 108 0 obj <>stream Clean guitars sound really good with the e609. It’s more detailed an airy at the top end than the e609. Sennheiser e609 Silver Instrument Microphone Summary: Need a great mic to close-mic your amp? 0000063639 00000 n �x������- �����[��� 0����}��y)7ta�����>j���T�7���@���tܛ�`q�2��ʀ��&���6�Z�L�Ą?�_��yxg)˔z���çL�U���*�u�Sk�Se�O4?׸�c����.� � �� R� ߁��-��2�5������ ��S�>ӣV����d�`r��n~��Y�&�+`��;�A4�� ���A9� =�-�t��l�`;��~p���� �Gp| ��[`L��`� "A�YA�+��Cb(��R�,� *�T�2B-� Completely honest sound. e 609 | 6/7 Specifications Specifications Transducer principle dynamic Frequency response 40 - 15,000 Hz Pick-up pattern super-cardioid Sensitivity (free field, no load) 1.5 mV/Pa W�,�ӁX��� The e609 does not handle snares well. N'��)�].�u�J�r� The e609 may reject rear noise a bit better than the SM57. The mic is a bit bright, but not sibilant. 0000002426 00000 n Both have a similar sound quality, but when recording distorted electric guitar, the Sennheiser e609 … 0000087418 00000 n "F$H:R��!z��F�Qd?r9�\A&�G���rQ��h������E��]�a�4z�Bg�����E#H �*B=��0H�I��p�p�0MxJ$�D1��D, V���ĭ����KĻ�Y�dE�"E��I2���E�B�G��t�4MzN�����r!YK� ���?%_&�#���(��0J:EAi��Q�(�()ӔWT6U@���P+���!�~��m���D�e�Դ�!��h�Ӧh/��']B/����ҏӿ�?a0n�hF!��X���8����܌k�c&5S�����6�l��Ia�2c�K�M�A�!�E�#��ƒ�d�V��(�k��e���l ����}�}�C�q�9 104 27 0000000016 00000 n The tone of the e609 sounds more natural and transparent than the darker sound of the SM57. Clip does not hold the mic well, as it’s way too small. You may have to EQ out the harshness in the SM57, while the e609 can be left flat with no EQ. Interested in an in depth comparison of each? In his spare time, he likes to fish, paint, play guitar, pray, rap, make beats, take photos, record videos, graphic design, and more. The standout feature here is definitely the ability to use the mic without a stand. Before we get into the Shure SM57 vs. Sennheiser e609 comparison, grab a snack, sit back and relax because.. Today I will outline the e609 and then compare/contrast it with the SM57 towards the end. Even a great mic may sound bad if the amp is bad. Phenomenal sound reproduction. startxref xref In studio, the most common way is to mic your guitar cabinet, and then run it through an interface. The placement with the e609 isn’t as critical as with the SM57. 0000078434 00000 n The SM57 handles cabinets with distortion better, while the e609 records clean guitars with ease. n�3ܣ�k�Gݯz=��[=��=�B�0FX'�+������t���G�,�}���/���Hh8�m�W�2p[����AiA��N�#8$X�?�A�KHI�{!7�. 135° Nettoyage et entretien du e 609 … The housing around the grill is made of a sturdy plastic. I would also say that the majority of reviewers preferred this over the SM57, though there were a few who liked the 57 better. Has a better bass response than the SM57. It can handle a higher SPL (Sound pressure level) than an SM57. Did I miss the mark on something? e 609 silver - Guitar Microphone - Super Cardioid Pick-Up - Studio, Live Performance, Recording - Sennheiser Discover True Sound - Top-quality products and tailor made solutions - sennheiser.com So for: The SM57 does do a few things better than the e609, but is still outclassed by another dark horse mic: The Audix i5. Check out: Questions? Some call that “scooped” or missing. The SM57 requires a mic stand to place in front of a guitar cabinet, while the e609 does not (you can hang it instead). Replacement needed. Perhaps most importantly, the source of where your sound is coming from does outweigh the quality of the mic. 0000260990 00000 n 0000033078 00000 n 0000000836 00000 n 0000066945 00000 n 135°). The supercardioid e 609 Silver instrument microphone has … �0 In� 0000069472 00000 n ��w�G� xR^���[�oƜch�g�`>b���$���*~� �:����E���b��~���,m,�-��ݖ,�Y��¬�*�6X�[ݱF�=�3�뭷Y��~dó ���t���i�z�f�6�~`{�v���.�Ng����#{�}�}��������j������c1X6���fm���;'_9 �r�:�8�q�:��˜�O:ϸ8������u��Jq���nv=���M����m����R 4 � In his spare time, he likes to fish, paint, play guitar, pray, rap, make beats, take photos, record videos, graphic design, and more. Required fields are marked *, “As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.”, “Stu is determined to help you make sound decisions, and strives to deliver the best and most in depth content on the internet! Your email address will not be published. I figured, at that price, I could afford for it to suck (not that I think it will) heh I guess I'm fortunate enough to have a friend in sales that gets me very good prices on new gear (I'm picking up my $70.00 Audix I5 on Saturday!) Now without further ado, let’s get rolling!! Both work well in similar recording situations. H�*��w6PH/�2P��w�5Pp�� Before we get into the Sennheiser e906 vs. e609, grab a snack, sit back and relax because.. ... Another thing to note is placement. You may have to EQ out the harshness in the SM57, while the e609 can be left flat with no EQ. The placement with the e609 isn’t as critical as with the SM57. 0 The SM57 requires a mic stand to place in front of a guitar cabinet, while the e609 does not (you can hang it instead). Placement des enceintes de retour Pour éviter tout Larsen et une faible isolation par rapport aux autres sources sonores, placez les enceintes de retour de façon à ce qu’elles se trouvent dans l’angle d’atténuation maximale du microphone (env. . 0000001426 00000 n You can simply hang it over your amp and either tie it down with railroad tie or simply duct tape that bad boy! 0000068267 00000 n Provided clip is too small, but is meant to hang without a mic stand. It also seems to excel in many areas that the SM57 does not. 2y�.-;!���K�Z� ���^�i�"L��0���-�� @8(��r�;q��7�L��y��&�Q��q�4�j���|�9�� 0000078473 00000 n Some say you need to use it in conjunction with an SM57 to achieve optimal results. U��� v |� e 609 | 6/7 Specifications Specifications Transducer principle dynamic Frequency response 40 - 15,000 Hz Pick-up pattern super-cardioid Sensitivity (free field, no load) 1.5 mV/Pa While some mics, like the Sennheiser e609 and e906, are designed as side-address and can work well when suspended from a mic cable wrapped around the amp handle, I know that amp cabinet designers do NOT determine handle position so that mics will be in the sonically ideal position. Home Studio Guide – Part I (Introduction), The Best Audiophile Headphones [Complete Buyer’s Guide], The Best Audiophile Headphones (Part II) [Complete Buyer’s Guide], The Best Audiophile Headphones (Part III) [Complete Buyer’s Guide], The Best Audiophile Headphones (Part IV) [Complete Buyer’s Guide], The 5 Best Audiophile Headphones For Under $500, The Best Headphones for Gaming [In Depth Guide], Blue Yeti vs. AT2020 vs. Samson C01 [Definitive Guide], Philips SHP9500 vs. AKG K702 vs. HIFIMAN DEVA. Comments? Overall I would say that the e609 is a bit more convenient than the SM57, as it does not require a mic stand. I’ve heard that the original Black e609’s are superior to the gray ones. %%EOF Best of all, the recordings are impressively accurate. window.dojoRequire(["mojo/signup-forms/Loader"], function(L) { L.start({"baseUrl":"mc.us19.list-manage.com","uuid":"0573ad2c5093a15ee16bc49c5","lid":"f49b0eb597","uniqueMethods":true}) }). Requests? It’s a dynamic microphone, so you will not need 48v phantom power for it. Especially great for live settings.